This is exactly the type of information that needs to be posted and distributed by USLC. I have to believe that there was engineering and testing done for this, why can't USLC post some of their reasoning for this, and exactly what it is intended to prevent (replacing clips or reduce flex in front clip). Exactly how much flex is there now, and how much will this remove. I have to believe this was all addressed before this bulletin was put out. Without their input, everyone is making guesses as to what is the intent, when the manufacturer sits quiet.....
Not being even close to a chassis guru, I would think that the less the chassis flexes, and the more that is controlled by the shock and spring package, the better. The springs can be adjusted, the flex in the car is kinda an unknown. Am I right in thinking this way?